Torhoo onion mirror : torhoocc3yugradvhrppml2fin4xob7kgg7uf42s4xk7p6r5vzy62ead.onion

Can someone shed some light on this: "Defeats advanced Wi-Fi device tracking [64] [65]: NO" : OpSec | Torhoo darknet markets

Taken from Whonix comparison table of Tails Tor Whonix and Qubes (https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Comparison_with_Others)

It says none of these OS/apps defeat advanced Wifi device tracking.
The citations ([64] [65]) say:
[64] : Why MAC Address Randomization is not Enough:An Analysis of Wi-Fi Network Discovery Mechanisms
[65] : A Passive Technique for Fingerprinting Wireless Devices with Wired-side Observation

So what's going on here? What are the OpSec implications?

/u/bennythehandsofficial

2 points

4 years ago

I agree, it did take mad long. Vendor only responded to one message when I told him I dosed it with the tip of a toothpick instead of volumetric scale. Wasn't really a question and didn't need a reply so I just assumed vendor checks messages once it a while....I did ask him for a chili recipe after he replied cause I figured wth I had no real questions for him...still waiting on that recipe though.

/u/party 📢

1 points

4 years ago

How long did it take in your case?

/u/funktioningadct

2 points

4 years ago

was this for the blue etizo smackers he has up rn?
they're pretty cheap so i'm just worried i'll get goatsed

/u/party 📢

2 points

4 years ago

Product Reviewed: Etizolam powder

/u/zk222

1 points

4 years ago

Why did you rate the quality 4/5? Was it not ~99% purity +/- 5%? I'm interested in a G, but even with the price, though if it were even 70% purity that'd still be decent, I want to know the accurate dose of what I am taking.

Sponsors