DO NOT USE TELEGRAM !!! Your anonymity in danger !!! : OpSec

2 points

5 months ago

Didn't Session remove forward secrecy, a feature that was available in the Signal protocol which Session is based on? That's a bit of a problem.

And yes, I say this as someone who previously used Session before realizing this.

/u/chatnoir P 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖛𝖆𝖎𝖘

1 points

5 months ago

This, as well, thank you for reminding me!

/u/nihilist2

1 points

5 months ago

SimpleX is the answer, not session.
http://blog.nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/opsec/anonsimplex/index.html

Privacy:
The application must be free and open source (FOSS)
The application must have End to End Encryption by default (E2EE)
The application must allow us to run and use our own servers (Decentralisation)

Anonymity:
The application must support Tor .onion servers out of the box
The application must allow you to chat without requiring any information (no emails, no usernames, no phone numbers)
The application must have the ability for us to join chatrooms without revealing our identity (Incognito Mode)

Deniability:
The application must have disappearing messages (Deniability)

/u/chatnoir P 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖛𝖆𝖎𝖘

1 points

5 months ago

What the fuck is going on with people shilling Session this hard?

/u/treblex 🇦🇺ǝᴉssnⱯ ʎɹɐuoH

1 points

5 months ago

Most of the people on dread are retards.
They will read an article somewhere from someone and take it for granted for the rest of their lives without making their own research on the matter.

/u/chatnoir P 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖛𝖆𝖎𝖘

1 points

5 months ago

Very true.

/u/bartysims

1 points

5 months ago

Is it because it's easier and more user friendly?

/u/chatnoir P 𝕸𝖆𝖚𝖛𝖆𝖎𝖘

1 points

5 months ago

Easier? You try having a group on that app...