Torhoo onion mirror : torhoocc3yugradvhrppml2fin4xob7kgg7uf42s4xk7p6r5vzy62ead.onion

EC-INTERNATIONAL DRUG CHECKING SERVICE: LAB ERROR RELATED TO FLUBROMAZOLAM : EnergyControl | Torhoo darknet markets

We want to communicate the community an incident related with our International Drug Checking Service.

On July 3th we communicated the result of a sample received in our Service , submitted as "alprazolam". We reported this sample as "no active substances detected".

The person who sent the sample was surprised about this result. That sample had been used by him before drug checking, and produced psychoactive effects, according to his experience.

In cases like this, we review available data and submit substances to additional tests , if necessary. After carefully reviewing lab data, a tiny, uncommon and strange peak appear in the test spectrum. Additional techniques were used and revealed the presence of flubromazolam.

Our techniques are callibrated in order to detect vurtually all active substances, including new NPS or substances active in rank of micrograms (as fentanyl analogs). In fact our team has reported new substances in many ocassions. But our systems are not 100% perfect and occasionally there are incidents like this.

Thanks to provided info we´ve been able to optimize our machines to avoid in the future this mistake that is our responsability. We have had no problems to detect previously substances as flualprazolam or flubromazolam but in this case our systems failed. We think this is probably due to a low concentration in the sample (but this is not 100% sure as we can not quantify flubromazolam in this moment). We have restructured protocols for benzodiacepines/unknown substances . We have verifed also that this error only affects sample provided and no other sample tested in our service and/or reported as "no active substance".

We have a strict policy of honesty and transparency. We have been accused in some ocassions of "providing fake results" or " invent results", unfairly and without providing any evidence.

In cases like this, in which the error is real and responsability is ours, we have no problems in communicate and make public all the information.

This issue has been covered also in http://dreadytofatroptsdj6io7l3xptbet6onoyno2yv7jicoxknyazubrad.onion/post/484908fe375ddf99c2ae

We apologize again, thanks for your understanding

/u/[deleted]

1 points

6 years ago

You are the true MVP!!!!

Glad I was able to help!

-BBB

/u/BonesKoopa

1 points

6 years ago

Wow interesting.
I had an assay from Cayman Chems about the team behind researching the fent and its analogue and their findings.
They were claiming that not only they could pretty much track every reputable vendor online, most certainly at the time being they probably meant surface net.
They also claimed they found newer variations, and Cayman makes newer ones anyways in order to establish a better palette so to speak of what could be produced in the future.
Scary shit, if i recall something "smalle" "more potent" with a scary name.
Had a cool picture of all the analgues in little bottles next to their parent fent in their approx LD50.
Shit was amazingly scary how small cartfent was.
Forensic science is amazing shit.
I really like what you guys do.
I remember reading one time your test are so good they can actually detect the plastic residue the drugs came in on that sometimes rub off on chemicals due to whatever variations.
keep up the good work, blessed are the minds behind your cause.

/u/BritishStandard

1 points

6 years ago*

Does that mean I can send in another sample free of charge then because you told me my bars were nothing? Ecstasy Data are also providing false results with peoples products. So it looks like there is something going on that we all dont know about.. Wedinos in the UK are the only ones providing legit results.

/u/DoctorX 📢

1 points

5 years ago

Absolutely not.
We try to do the best of our work. And we try to be considerated with people that facilitates our work and have trust in it.
In this case, the user contacted with us through email, provided data about his sample and explained (very politely) his strangeness about original test result. He provided useful info and made it public in this forum. He accepted our explanations...and did not even ask for a free testing.
Yesterday we provided him with a free testing in acknowledgement of his support.
If you read the original message "We have verifed also that this error only affects sample provided and no other sample tested in our service and/or reported as "no active substance".So we can not offer free testing to anyone shouting in forums that we or Ecstasydata or whoever provide fake results. We are a NGO, but we are not stupid