News Feed
  • DrugHub has agreed to fully refund all users who lost money in the SuperMarket exit scam.  
  • Retro Market has gone offline. Circumstances of the closure unknown.  
  • SuperMarket has closed following an exit scam by one of the admins.  
  • The admin of Incognito Market, Pharoah, has been arrested by the FBI several months after exit scamming.  
  • Silk RoadTorhoo mini logo
  • darknet markets list
  • Popular P2P exchange LocalMonero has announced it is closing.  

HavenoReto or Open Monero? : Monero | Torhoo darknet markets

Ok so I don't like how kraken asks for proof of funds and shit like that. so i've been trying to do haveno reto but there are not many sellers/buyers on there and very high minimums some as high as 700 dollars is the minimum you can purchase and there is a security deposit. i've been looking at other p2p options and saw openmonero which is a fork of local monero. has anyone used open monero before? and how did it go? i'm thinking of giving it a shot. thanks in advance for any info/tips/advice!
/u/cognac
3 points
5 months ago
Don't you think it's curious not a single person online has used openmonero? Yet for retoswap you can find dozens.
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
5 months ago*
The OM platform was introduced on dread a month ago. http://dreadytofatroptsdj6io7l3xptbet6onoyno2yv7jicoxknyazubrad.onion/post/c59894e1dc11a2fca5e6

What are you expecting in 30 days?
However, the platform is not brand new (released on june 2024) and there's lots of reviews and feedback on session and telegram (@p2p_monero_talk)
/u/cognac
1 points
5 months ago
June 2024 is almost a year ago and still there is nobody around who can vouch for it. No buyers and no sellers. Very strange.
/u/OpenMonero
2 points
5 months ago*
It seems you haven't read my full comment.

Hundreds of feedback and reviews can be found on telegram (@p2p_monero_talk) and session (https://sessioncommunities.online > Monero SOG).

There are 122 verified vendors (ex localmonero traders) that have already imported their profile + reputation + feedback to openmonero. (Verify integrity with tg handle or PGP if you are paranoid)

See full list of vendors here: http://ejsx3rexkkaxrwe3dol2lml42fug7mxze3aoayshbj7vjhopng6uwlyd.onion/guides/how-to-import-reputation#cachedUserList

The platform has lots of activity (300 active ads from 90-100 active vendors)
Openmonero is growing organically which is more safe. Moreover, the platform is non-custodial, eliminating the need for platform-held funds.

What are you afraid of? The platform does not require any Javascript and code is opensource.

i2p and onion addresses are in the footer. (Note: do not use clearnet if you dont trust cloudlfare proxy)
/u/cognac
1 points
4 months ago
Perhaps you did not understand my post instead retard. There are 0 posts by buyers or vendors anyhere except your fake telegram group. The vendor list on your scam site is meaningless. I can create a list on my website too. Is that legit too? The amount of ads on your site can easily be faked too. Where are the users?
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
4 months ago*
Vendor list is very useful as 90% of the vendors have their tg handle on their public profile. With the tg handle you can verify if vendor is real or not. Just compare the tg handle with localmonero.co. This should be easy to verify bc all the usernames are ident on openmonero and localmonero, then open a trade with a trusted trader and tell him to DM you via his tg handle. That's it!

Moreover there are at least 25 well-known vendors that are admins on @p2p_monero_talk. Check tg handle and compare with trusted sources like localmonero.co
/u/SilverTeam P
1 points
5 months ago
With HavenoReto (RetoSwap) you don't rely on a centralized platform. It cuts off any potentially troublesome middle man and you transact with the end user directly.
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
5 months ago*
Pls stop spreading misinformation. Decentralization and censorship resistance is not the same. Haveno is not decentralized, since order book and accounts are not shared between instances and the reto arbitrator himself acts a single point of failure. What happens if the reto guy stops breathing suddenly? Who is going to dispute in such a scenario?
/u/SilverTeam P
1 points
4 months ago
There is enough information available for everyone to do their own research to make an informed decision with regard to the technology and the interpretation of the term decentralization. The concept of Haveno intends multiple arbitrators.
https://docs.haveno.exchange/
http://www.dds6qkxpwdeubwucdiaord2xgbbeyds25rbsgr73tbfpqpt4a6vjwsyd.onion/wiki/RetoSwap
http://blog.nowherejezfoltodf4jiyl6r56jnzintap5vyjlia7fkirfsnfizflqd.onion/opsec/finances/index.html
http://kycnotmezdiftahfmc34pqbpicxlnx3jbf5p7jypge7gdvduu7i6qjqd.onion/service/haveno
/u/AutoModerator M
1 points
4 months ago
We are temporarily blocking URLs until the phisher stops his game.

This comment was posted automatically by a bot. All AutoModerator settings are configured by individual communities. Contact this community's Moderators to have your post approved if you believe this was in error.
/u/[deleted]
1 points
4 months ago
If you stop breathing openmonero stops. And apparently Reto is a group so they're more likely to be resilient from stop breathing than you lol
/u/[deleted]
1 points
4 months ago
Try no-deposit offers, theres people selling small sums and you dont need security deposits but you need to find a seller
/u/0xOtraquetero
0 points
5 months ago
Haveno retro , is good
/u/snowonthabluff420 📢
2 points
5 months ago
there's like no offers on there though. and the offers that are there have minimums of like 750$. not really tryint to test if something works with 750 dollars ya know? if it was like 50 or something then it might be worth a shot, but im not trying to chance it on almost a grand lol. bc i have haveno reto and i like the concept. but just lack of options is what is making it not a real viable option.
/u/cognac
3 points
5 months ago
if you do not see an offer you like then you can very easily create one yourself
/u/snowonthabluff420 📢
1 points
4 months ago
Thank you so much. You're so right and thats a great idea. I'm just still wondering what would happen if i made an offer to buy, but then I wasn't online when they accept it? can they only accept it when I'm online? Thanks for the help btw!
/u/monero_desk_support
2 points
4 months ago
If your are not online, your offer isn't either. Which means that when you see an offer, someone behind it is online. It has the advantage to reduce makers becoming unresponsive. (not a bug, a feature :d).
/u/0xOtraquetero
1 points
5 months ago
Filter seller with payment: western union , more ofert
/u/snowonthabluff420 📢
1 points
5 months ago
i'm trying to buy it with fiat and there are currently no western union offers. theres more for cryptocurrencies like swapping them, but as far as buying xmr with fiat (money) there are only 5 total offers unfortunately. bc if i buy any crypto, i have to do it on an exchange which isn't anonymous.
/u/AutoModerator M
1 points
5 months ago
We are temporarily blocking URLs until the phisher stops his game.

This comment was posted automatically by a bot. All AutoModerator settings are configured by individual communities. Contact this community's Moderators to have your post approved if you believe this was in error.
/u/OpenMonero
-1 points
5 months ago*
I am the admin of openmonero.com, so let me share my thought about Haveno

As time goes on, haveno will become more user-friendly and fix all the issues that openmonero has already fixed. Both projects are opensource and non-custodial.

Haveno issues

1. seller deposit is necessary to post orders. Do not make a deposit unless you are sure that you are going to trade it.

2. security deposit required for buyers due to coin-locking

3. not easy to learn (high learning curve)

4. only 5 ads on haveno while openmonero has 300 ads

5. requires a daemon to be running on a computer of yours

6. you cant review your trading partner (no reputation of feedback system)

7. requires to install additional software (universal tracker potential)
/u/monero_desk_support
2 points
4 months ago*
You should use the term maker and taker, it's less confusing than seller and buyer.

1. You can remove your order if it has not been taken and get back all your funds with no delay. It gets locked only if the offer is accepted.

2. Non deposit offer exists, you can ask on simplex/matrix group makers to create one if you don't have any xmr.

3. Once it's installed, it's easy to use. Installation is no different than any other software (ok maybe a need to add an exclusion for the antivirus if you'r on windows ?). If openmonero is mobile friendly, then ok it is more user friendly.

4. 5 ads ? please... . Aboutt 40 offers for EUR and 20 offers for USD.
https://haveno.markets/market/EUR
https://haveno.markets/market/USD
Bear in mind an offer on Haveno has more value than in openmonero because:
Maker must be online
Maker can't share funds between multiple offers.
And there is more than 3800 successful trades. Do we have any data on the number of trades in openmonero ?

5. What daemon are you talking about ? you can you use a remote node, haveno will choose one automatically if you don't have one locally.

6. It is not needed because of the deposit requirement. Scammer risk loosing their funds. Reputation system can always be faked with faked account and collusion.

7. What additional software ? there is only the need to install haveno. It doesn't send a user agent or anything, I don't see how it is adding tracking contrary to a web browser.

Although I think openmonero can be useful, your critics on Haveno are mostly wrong.
/u/OpenMonero
0 points
4 months ago*
1. You can remove your order if it has not been taken and get back all your funds with no delay. It gets locked only if the offer is accepted.

Why do you need to make a haveno deposit in the first place to post an offer? This is always a security vulnerability. A malicious haveno arbi could create a taker acc; send a trade request with the taker acc; then dispute with taker acc and finally steal the bond with 2/3 votes. Multi-sig was never intended for p2p trading and is very easy to hijack on haveno. Arbis always have full power over your locked funds bc they can use fake accs (to get 2/3 votes) and since there is no reputation or feedback system on haveno, nobody will ever know that you got scammed by the arbi himself and (maker cant easily review the taker).


2. Non deposit offer exists, you can ask on simplex/matrix group makers to create one if you don't have any xmr.

I heard about that and I thought all ads do not require security deposit anymore but according to you its up to the maker. Anyways, it is bad for the user experience to allow the maker to set a security deposit requirement for the taker. This should be disabled in the software.

3. Once it's installed, it's easy to use. Installation is no different than any other software (ok maybe a need to add an exclusion for the antivirus if you'r on windows ?). If openmonero is mobile friendly, then ok it is more user friendly.

I wasn't talking about the installation process. The ui is not straigtforward and a little bloated in my experience. Why is java required? Why do I have to create multiple accounts for each currency?

Bear in mind an offer on Haveno has more value than in openmonero because: Maker must be online; Maker can't share funds between multiple offers.

Haveno doesn't have any external notification system, so being online doesn't mean the maker can reply in a timely manner.
Openmonero offers are probably more valuable, due to various notification protocols (email, session, nostr) and reputation/feedback system.

5. What daemon are you talking about ? you can you use a remote node, haveno will choose one automatically if you don't have one locally.

I am talking about the haveno daemon that is required else your offers aren't visible. It's a security issue bc a deamon can do lots of malicious things like auto updates, keylogging, etc

6. It is not needed because of the deposit requirement. Scammer risk loosing their funds. Reputation system can always be faked with faked account and collusion.

Security deposit is bad for user experience and does not prevent of getting scammed by the arbi himself. The arbi could create a fake acc as mentioned above (in number 1) and steal the arbi bond from the maker very easily. The reputation and feedback system cannot be easily faked on openmonero bc only trades worth at least $100 USD are visible. It would take lots of effort plus financial resources to fake the feedback system.

7. What additional software ? there is only the need to install haveno. It doesn't send a user agent or anything, I don't see how it is adding tracking contrary to a web browser.

Java is required. Do your own research but I would never install java on my personal computer. It is developed by oracle and has lots of vulnerabilties that are treated as features and not bugs.
/u/monero_desk_support
2 points
4 months ago*
1/
Currently only the Retoswap team has the role of arbitrators, not like xmrbazaar for example where anyone can become an arbitrator and where reputation is important. If someone get his funds stolen with by the reto team, it would be easy to share it and an another network of arbitrators would replace them. I agree this is not the best, but so far it is working. For your interest, other system exist, like if the two disagree about something, both lose their security deposit. Which means no one can win, so no one will want to risk having an issue. 100% collusion proof, but a bit extreme ^^.

2/
it is bad for the user experience to allow the maker to set a security deposit requirement for the taker

It's a requirement to prevent scamming. No need for a fallible reputation system. And because a system without it exist, there is a way to get your first xmr nonetheless.

3/
Why is java required?

Because the software is written in java ? It is already installed on most system anyway. But I agree this is an extra step and so is less user friendly than a website.

Why do I have to create multiple accounts for each currency?

By "account", it is just a way to provide a way to share the needed information about your payment method like the RIB. In openmonero, you also need to share this data at some point correct ? In haveno, you do it at the beginning and it share it automatically when a taker take the offer once the deposit is done. It is a much better experience than waiting for the maker to share the info manually.

he ui is not straigtforward and a little bloated in my experience

I find it complex at first look but very natural to use in practice. The look could be improved I agree.

4/
Haveno doesn't have any external notification system, so being online doesn't mean the maker can reply in a timely manner.

It has notification on desktop. Nothing prevent it to also have mail notification or even push notification if there's an app developed. Technically it is possible, just that no one wrote code for it yet. I agree openmonero currently beats haveno there.

Openmonero offers are probably more valuable, due to various notification protocols (email, session, nostr) and reputation/feedback system.


We were talking about liquidity. You were comparing the raw number of offers between haveno and openmonero. Notification system (better on openmonero) and reputation/feedback (not needed on Haveno) are not related to liquidity.

If you compare the raw number of offers between the two, you must take into account that once an offer is taken on openmonero, another one which shared the same liquidity will disappear. Also an offer can stay on openmonero and even if taken, will never produce a completed trade because the maker will never be online again. That's not possible with haveno.

5/
It's a security issue bc a deamon can do lots of malicious things like auto updates, keylogging, etc


Like any other running software ? You know you have a lot of daemon running on any system.

6/
The reputation and feedback system cannot be easily faked on openmonero bc only trades worth at least $100 USD are visible. It would take lots of effort plus financial resources to fake the feedback system.

There is always a possibility of selective scamming. You build up your reputation until someone wants to trade a big amount. It is not possible on Haveno because of the security deposit. Also I don't see why the 100$ changes a thing, you can always complete fake trades with two accounts colluding, without having any real fiat amount transferred. I really don't think we currently have a technical way to make a good reputation system. Ofc it can be better than nothing, but I think security deposit is much better for preventing scams. Yes it requires a little worse experience for the user (I would argue only if it doesn't have already xmr), but getting scammed is the worse experience ever.

7/
Java is required. Do your own research but I would never install java on my personal computer. It is developed by oracle and has lots of vulnerabilities that are treated as features and not bugs.


You are right in this case. I agree that even though the code is open source, the choice to use java instead of a safer language like rust and having the code non audited (a part from the monero c lib it is using that is audited) is a good argument against Haveno.
But at least we've got something truly DEX for FIAT <-> XMR.

Oh also, Haveno has no fees. Can't beat that.

It's a pleasure to continue the discussion if you have other points to make. In my mind openmonero does have a better user experience and is pretty good (no js, onion etc). I'm glad something like localmonero appeared again (thank you to making it opensource !)
However I think Haveno is more safe (deposit vs reputation) and has less risk of being taken down (DEX vs website)
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
4 months ago*
Nothing would stop the Haveno network operators from making automated fake orders if the money pool gets big enough. The Haveno pot gets bigger with each new offer, while more offers on OpenMonero don’t necessarily mean more XMR in the pot since vendors only need to put down a security deposit of 0.35 XMR to list as many offers as they want. So, you could see 1,000 offers from different vendors on OpenMonero, but the admin might only hold 350 XMR (1,000 offers x 0.35xmr) in custody because of how self-custodial trade funding work.

It’s also worth mentioning that a decent exit scam usually needs to involve at least 1 million dollars; no one’s going to pull an exit scam for just 80k (1,000 offers x 0.35 XMR x 231 USD). OpenMonero was redesigned in Nov 2024 to help prevent exit scams from happening in the first place.

On the flip side, if there were 1,000 offers on Haveno, the pot would be at least 800k, which is about ten times what you’d see on OpenMonero since each offer on Haveno requires the exact trading amount to be locked up.

Plus, if a team successfully pulls off an exit scam, they could easily set up a new network with a different name and try to pull the same stunt again when the pot gets big enough.

Reference: https://rl.bloat.cat/r/Monero/comments/1h4icot/is_haveno_anymore_secure_than_trading_with_a/

Oh also, Haveno has no fees. Can't beat that.

If you’re not paying for the product, then you are the product.
/u/monero_desk_support
1 points
4 months ago
After some thoughts, I think you are right and that the arbitration system in Haveno doesn't prevent arbitrators from pulling the funds. They would need to create a bot that takes all the offers and automatically unlock the funds with the key of the taker and arbitrator (the attack would still need a good amount of xmr to fund every deposit, so for ex if they want to steal 1000xmr, they would need to provide about 250xmr, but they would have confidence in getting them back). It's a very possible scenario. Maybe it could be prevented by adding more arbitrators ? I need to check how the arbitrator is chosen exactly by the maker/taker.

But in openmonero, how do you manage a situation where someone takes an offer to buy xmr, send money (wiretransfer for ex) and the seller never send the xmr ? Will you refund the buyer with your own pocket since the maker didn't fund the offer completely ?

If you’re not paying for the product, then you are the product.


That's untrue for a lot of things. I download movies for free, am I the product ? Linux is free, are you the product ? In the open source world, it's far from reality.
To be fair, the reto group said they got a large donation and would put the fees at 0 for a long time for Haveno to get some traction.
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
4 months ago*
investment = security deposit

The Haveno network operators can steal much more if they invest 250 XMR, assuming the investment stays safe and comes back to the taker bots. Once the investment returns, the same taker bot can just do the same thing again. In theory, one taker bot with an amount of XMR equal to the highest maker security deposit could clear out the entire order book since its balance goes up with every completed trade. So, it’s really just a matter of time before the whole order book is wiped out. Even worse, if you’ve got multiple taker and arbiter bots working simultaneously, you could clear the whole order book in just a second. All you need.

The reason is that a shady arbiter bot backs the taker bot and will side with them in any disputes. Moreover, the arbiter bot can also hit all the market makers with penalties, taking away their 15% security deposits.

Just to point out, your example isn’t right because the security deposits from market makers are part of the pool too.

Check out my corrected examples below. If you invest 250 XMR, you could pull off a rug pull worth around half a million dollars, and unfortunately, the current liquidity (as of 22 Jan '25 23:00) makes it possible to steal nearly 900k.


EXAMPLE I
all maker offers: 1000 xmr (liquidity)
+ all maker security deposits: 150 xmr
+ all arbitration fees: 0 xmr
- all taker security deposits: 150 xmr (investment)
------------------------------------------
total: 1150 xmr x 233 usd = 267,950 usd (exit scam)


EXAMPLE II
all maker offers: 1,670 xmr (liquidity)
+ all maker security deposits: 250 xmr
+ all arbitration fees: 0 xmr
- all taker security deposits: 250 xmr (investment)
------------------------------------------
total: 1,920 xmr x 233 usd = 447,360 usd (exit scam)


EXAMPLE with data from https://haveno.markets/
all maker offers: 3,232 xmr (liquidity)
+ all maker security deposits: 484 xmr
+ all arbitration fees: 0 xmr
- all taker security deposits: 484 xmr (investment)
------------------------------------------
total: 3,716 xmr x 233 usd = 866,014 usd (exit scam)


NOTE: You don't really need to invest a lot to liquidate the entire order book and my examples are not necessary (unless you want to clear the order book in the first round) as the balance of each taker bot demonstrates substantial, logarithmic growth following each transaction. This is because taker bots always go for the highest maker offer in the pot first.
/u/monero_desk_support
1 points
4 months ago
Thanks for the example. I acknowledge this is an issue.
You didn't answered how you manage a situation on openmonero where someone sending fiat doesn't get paid since the security deposit doesn't cover all the funds.
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
4 months ago*
The minimum requirement of 0.35 XMR security deposit for sellers on OpenMonero is there to help cut down on spam offers. While it’s not really meant to fund an offer, you can still use it for that (or just fund the difference) as long as the buyer’s trade request is no more than the security deposit.

Both the seller and the buyer can cancel a trade request if they feel like the other person isn't trustworthy since no xmr is locked at this early stage. Right now, the seller is chatting with the buyer and checking out their reputation, looking at things like how long they've been registered and what kind of feedback they've received. Should all evaluations meet satisfactory criteria, the seller has the option to secure an arbitration bond utilizing either an internal wallet (security deposit) or an external wallet (such as Cakewallet, Moneroju, Feather Wallet, Monero CLI Wallet, etc.)

For big trades, the seller might choose to fund the bond from a separate external wallet to avoid any potential scams from the arbitrator right from the start. On the other hand, for smaller trades, its usually easier for the seller to just use the internal wallet (security deposit) for the bond. By allowing both types of wallets for funding, the platform strikes a good balance between keeping things liquid and secure.

If there weren’t an option for external bond funding, there's a chance that an arbitrator could run off with all the money. But because funding is done manually, it really cuts down the risk of good exit scams or bots locking up coins.


Let’s say we have 1,000 sellers, each looking to sell 50 XMR. On OpenMonero, sellers can get trade requests without needing to fully fund a sell offer (just 0.35 XMR is enough to show their sell offer in search results). But on Haveno, sellers have to lock 50 XMR upfront + 7.5 XMR security deposit before they can get any trade requests. This means all haveno sellers pretty much have to lock that funds, or they won't get any trades. Currently, OpenMonero possesses a total of 81,550 USD (1,000 sellers x 0.35 XMR x 233 USD). In contrast, Haveno holds an alarming 13,397,500 USD (1,000 sellers x 57,5 XMR x 233 USD), derived from the same number of sellers, which presents a considerable risk of potential exit scams.

NOTE: An openmonero arbiter can steal the externally funded bond from a seller once its in the pot, but he can't grab all the potential liquidity (50,000 XMR = 11,650,000 USD) in the market, unless, of course, every seller posts their arbitration bonds at the same time, which is statistically improbable.

Let us consider a scenario in which 10 sellers, each with a trade finalization time of 24 hours, sell their 50 XMR daily. In this context, openmonero would be able to execute an exit scam amounting to only 850 XMR (1,000 sell offers x 0.35 XMR + (10 sellers x 50 XMR bonds)). This figure represents a mere 1.7% of the total market liquidity, which stands at 50,000 XMR (11.65 million USD). On the other hand, with Haveno, it’s theoretically possible to steal all the liquidity, no matter how many trades happen each day.

In the four examples presented below, we shall assume an average trade finalization time of 24 hours, with XMR valued at 233 USD. It is important to highlight that an increase in the trade finalization time results in a greater quantity of bonds within the pot. The term "trade finalization time" refers both to the moment at which the bond is removed from the pot for transfer to the buyer's non-custodial wallet, as well as the duration for which it remains within the pot. Should we adjust the finalization time to 12 hours, the potential exit scam amount associated with the bonds would be diminished by 50% (unless, of course, every seller posts their bonds at the same time, which is statistically improbable)

Variables:
# bond = 50 xmr
# timeframe = 1 day = 24 hours = 86400 seconds
# trade finalization time = 24 hours = 86400 seconds
# exit scam factor = timeframe / trade finalization time = 86400 / 86400 = 1
# all arbitration bonds = sellers x bonds / exit scam factor


# sellers per day = 1
all security deposits: 350 xmr
+ all arbitration bonds: 50 xmr
-----------------------------------
total: 400 xmr x 233 usd = 93,200 usd = 0.8% of total liquidity (exit scam)


# sellers per day = 10
all security deposits: 350 xmr
+ all arbitration bonds: 500 xmr
-----------------------------------
total: 850 xmr x 233 usd = 198,050 usd = 1.7% of total liquidity (exit scam)


# sellers per day = 20
all security deposits: 350 xmr
+ all arbitration bonds: 1,000 xmr
-----------------------------------
total: 1,350 xmr x 233 usd = 314,550 usd = 2.7% of total liquidity (exit scam)


# sellers per day = 30
all security deposits: 350 xmr
+ all arbitration bonds: 1,500 xmr
-----------------------------------
total: 1,850 xmr x 233 usd = 431,050 usd = 3.7% of total liquidity (exit scam)


Self-custodial trade funding serve to significantly mitigate the risk of total liquidity being jeopardized at all times. The occurrence of exit scams is relatively low within this model. I have intentionally used a longer trade finalization time, which deviates from conventional practices. For instance, my most popular seller (https://localmonero.co/user/jmcabc2008) operates with a trade finalization time of 21 minutes. If we assume that a majority of professional sellers maintain a similar finalization time (lets assume one hour), we can reasonably conclude that the probability of exit scams is reduced by a factor of at least 24 in comparison to the aforementioned examples.
# exit scam factor = timeframe / trade finalization time

Now, let’s consider a more realistic average trade finalization time of one hour. We’ll also project a remarkable 1000% increase in the daily number of sellers compared to our earlier examples, as we envision a thriving platform with a vibrant trading volume, much like the success localmonero enjoyed in its prime.

Variables:
# bond = 50 xmr
# timeframe = 1 day = 24 hours = 86400 seconds
# trade finalization time = 1 hour = 3600 seconds
# exit scam factor = timeframe / trade finalization time = 86400 / 3600 = 24
# all arbitration bonds = sellers x bonds / exit scam factor


# sellers per day = 100
all security deposits: 350 xmr
+ all arbitration bonds: 208 xmr
-----------------------------------
total: 558 xmr x 233 usd = 130,091 usd = 1,12% of total liquidity (exit scam)


# sellers per day = 200
all security deposits: 350 xmr
+ all arbitration bonds: 416 xmr
-----------------------------------
total: 767 xmr x 233 usd = 178,711 usd = 1,53% of total liquidity (exit scam)


# sellers per day = 300
all security deposits: 350 xmr
+ all arbitration bonds: 625 xmr
-----------------------------------
total: 975 xmr x 233 usd = 227,175 usd = 1,95% of total liquidity (exit scam)
/u/Moitoza
1 points
4 months ago
We can mitigate our own personal risk by using the 'Sell XMR' tab on Haveno, right? The person taking the Monero will have only their security deposit locked up, and my maker XMR will only locked up during the finalization time, like your system.
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
4 months ago*
This is untrue since all maker offers on haveno have to be pre-funded (locked up).

The funds in the non-custodial Haveno wallet (specifically, those that are not locked) are potentially at risk of an exit scam since the wallet is not isolated from the application framework. Furthermore, Haveno refunds are not returned to external wallets if an offer is disabled.

More here: http://dreadytofatroptsdj6io7l3xptbet6onoyno2yv7jicoxknyazubrad.onion/post/ea350ca8eade53bdf67d/#c-9550505b6e84499ec3
/u/OpenMonero
1 points
4 months ago*
Woodsers response (haveno dev):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5533743.msg65126603#msg65126603
/u/[deleted]
1 points
4 months ago
Lol "openmonero is made against exit scam", people are sending money to your wallet. And you also can setup a new openmonero with a different name