News Feed
  • DrugHub has agreed to fully refund all users who lost money in the SuperMarket exit scam.  
  • Retro Market has gone offline. Circumstances of the closure unknown.  
  • SuperMarket has closed following an exit scam by one of the admins.  
  • The admin of Incognito Market, Pharoah, has been arrested by the FBI several months after exit scamming.  
  • Silk RoadTorhoo mini logo
  • darknet markets list
  • Popular P2P exchange LocalMonero has announced it is closing.  

testing : FunFacts | Torhoo darknet markets

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

How about this?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJoS4ipAAoJEDREKQSEejVgzx0IALcoOX3jP/E7WRIjtApmzPmx
WSA3DD/xolUIjD6vLY5tIKbGNhQG7Z8hMq/B80mciP91AI4fZ/92aHt6ssAf/z/e
Z7JmytJbSI1RUE9nzJeut8HnJ/jUm4Ez9u5C40Cy92it1TE3OHVDXmoY1j+7gllj
C20W2JihICxhjvFWAVoV0SoEhe6v+hDt+xlug2XsvgdhjKif4wgqdSSAHvheRVJ0
MIdC5r/Q1w2A6SXTOiCaCGTJo4ruQBwRSRLFoXPywEQHKon/kckEJjziGjWzA3U7
6jj5sYAw1ADzJpoZAhZ1VUs6jit8pWMtUQLx5nnirSX7egXxE8dMBLBsAEDF9hc=
=twTl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
/u/maestrodutch P
1 points
1 month ago
works great ; )
/u/MrBacon420 P
1 points
1 month ago
I get bad signature
/u/maestrodutch P
1 points
1 month ago
same .
I think, I think I am
Therefore I am, I think
Of course you are my bright little star
I've miles and miles of files
Pretty files of your forefather's fruit
And now to suit our great computer
You're magnetic ink
I'm more than that
I know I am
At least, I think I must be
There you go man
Keep as cool as you can
Face piles of trials with smiles
It riles them to believe
That you perceive the web they weave
And keep on thinking free
Well fuck!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Try again
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE4sj8aUkCfiEmmTRtNEQpBIR6NWAFAmhLi3oACgkQNEQpBIR6
NWAf/ggAgfG1Ef7mr4/iAenthnMyPQKDwRvMGh+e6J46l5kbRgH4mrw8xaHlTUUC
SZ2MkTPqeVcnRoWuX1t7EgJ6h77Jcfp2UM9WVhZdHVuO4kgXrs+us1CuLzQji6vi
1ZMLh1TFIxjysywXqDQ49f87BW77DFKeP+u4PbNLAWtBoNK8cQgvnX7b2qVgN3km
LCnMLKDXAEa290zHLrIeV5FQg957pfV1AuC98m4eemDXHYaAO2a9D2lR01KZhKpE
fd8OCvYlw6kdkQDLVOAAwT0ZtFSzqg+kMqUI7WW5BemtC7OMZNs+Dp8HkuDJ7FnO
GARSiGwZ+rWE/tve/GTamUI7faa3Jw==
=/pc1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
/u/MrBacon420 P
1 points
1 month ago
Same thing, bad signature. /d/pgppractice haha
/u/MrBacon420 P
1 points
1 month ago
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Do I verify successfully?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iNUEARYKAH0WIQTzzjn+x6TaCveSNcLoljzMpVlqdAUCaEuMfV8UgAAAAAAuAChp
c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0RjND
RTM5RkVDN0E0REEwQUY3OTIzNUMyRTg5NjNDQ0NBNTU5NkE3NAAKCRDoljzMpVlq
dLsiAQCUqIK1Q+QgawEN/wR2x3pPxRxuVCjzF1Vz/rUysLyoIwD/dzChUmYMirlU
t1cfk8h9kZE7YYGG5xlup+qHHke+dwo=
=Wvrt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
# Verify Operation - Success

-> Signed On(UTC): Thursday, January 1, 1970 12:00:00 AM
-> Signed On(Localized): Wednesday, December 31, 1969 7:00:00 PM

## Signatures List:

### Signature [1]:
- Status: A Bad Signature.
- Signed By: MrBacon420
- Public Key Algo:
- Hash Algo:
- Sign Date(UTC): Thursday, January 1, 1970 12:00:00 AM
- Sign Date(Localized): Wednesday, December 31, 1969 7:00:00 PM

This Signature is invalid.


hah hah hah, you too are a phony
/u/MrBacon420 P
1 points
1 month ago
So as a heads up, I went through your profile doing sign verifications.

All of them come up bad before /post/c5d880948520eac78bb2/#c-e6b1f814a3d18146da - this is the latest one that verifies properly.

Signature created on Wednesday, 25 December 2024 03:48:32 UTC
With certificate:
Newbs <Fake@gmail.com> (3444 2904 847A 3560)
The signature is valid and the certificate's validity is fully trusted.

What changed five months ago? :)
My hard drive crashed but I had my key saved.
Why does this work?

http://dumpliwoard5qsrrsroni7bdiishealhky4snigbzfmzcquwo3kml4id.onion/image/7e7cad78fbb4d0c9.jpeg
/u/MrBacon420 P
1 points
1 month ago*
I'm trying to figure that out.
When I do the one in the thread from months ago that works - I did a gpg -v for verbose

gpg: Signature made Wed Dec 25 03:48:32 2024 UTC
gpg: using RSA key 0x34442904847A3560
gpg: using pgp trust model
gpg: Good signature from "Newbs <Fake@gmail.com>" [full]
gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm rsa2048
gpg: keydb: handles=2 locks=0 parse=2 get=2
gpg: build=0 update=0 insert=0 delete=0
gpg: reset=0 found=2 not=0 cache=0 not=0
gpg: kid_not_found_cache: count=0 peak=0 flushes=0
gpg: sig_cache: total=4 cached=4 good=4 bad=0
gpg: random usage: poolsize=600 mixed=6 polls=0/9 added=60/2912
outmix=2 getlvl1=1/8 getlvl2=0/0
gpg: rndjent stat: collector=0x0000000000000000 calls=0 bytes=0
gpg: secmem usage: 1344/65536 bytes in 2 blocks

When I do the message you posted earlier today (The "well fuck" one - I get)

Signature made Fri Jun 13 02:22:50 2025 UTC
gpg: using RSA key E2C8FC6949027E212699346D34442904847A3560

Which would be the wrong key

BUT
I do the one at the top of the post (the OP)

It shows the right RSA key but still fails


pg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
gpg: original file name=''
gpg: Signature made Fri Jun 13 02:10:49 2025 UTC
gpg: using RSA key 0x34442904847A3560
gpg: using pgp trust model
gpg: BAD signature from "Newbs <Fake@gmail.com>" [full]
gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA512, key algorithm rsa2048
gpg: keydb: handles=2 locks=0 parse=2 get=2
gpg: build=0 update=0 insert=0 delete=0
gpg: reset=0 found=2 not=0 cache=0 not=0
gpg: kid_not_found_cache: count=0 peak=0 flushes=0
gpg: sig_cache: total=4 cached=4 good=4 bad=0
gpg: random usage: poolsize=600 mixed=6 polls=0/8 added=54/2672
outmix=2 getlvl1=1/8 getlvl2=0/0
gpg: rndjent stat: collector=0x0000000000000000 calls=0 bytes=0
gpg: secmem usage: 1344/65536 bytes in 2 blocks

I'm slightly stumped
Why does your show bad signature?


# Verify Operation - Success

-> Signed On(UTC): Thursday, January 1, 1970 12:00:00 AM
-> Signed On(Localized): Wednesday, December 31, 1969 7:00:00 PM

## Signatures List:

### Signature [1]:
- Status: A Bad Signature.
- Signed By: MrBacon420
- Public Key Algo:
- Hash Algo:
- Sign Date(UTC): Thursday, January 1, 1970 12:00:00 AM
- Sign Date(Localized): Wednesday, December 31, 1969 7:00:00 PM

This Signature is invalid.
/u/MrBacon420 P
1 points
1 month ago
The date makes me suspicious.
-> Signed On(UTC): Thursday, January 1, 1970 12:00:00 AM
-> Signed On(Localized): Wednesday, December 31, 1969 7:00:00 PM

Signature created on Friday, 13 June 2025 02:27:09 UTC
With certificate:
MrBacon420 (E896 3CCC A559 6A74)
The signature is valid and the certificate's validity is ultimately trusted.
My current key id remains the same though?
I can't believe it. I guess that payback is hell.
Will the real newbs please stand up, please stand up?