News Feed
  • DrugHub has agreed to fully refund all users who lost money in the SuperMarket exit scam.  
  • Retro Market has gone offline. Circumstances of the closure unknown.  
  • SuperMarket has closed following an exit scam by one of the admins.  
  • The admin of Incognito Market, Pharoah, has been arrested by the FBI several months after exit scamming.  
  • Silk RoadTorhoo mini logo
  • darknet markets list
  • Popular P2P exchange LocalMonero has announced it is closing.  

USE AND ABUSE OF DRUG CHECKING BY CRYPTOMARKET VENDORS : EnergyControl | Torhoo darknet markets

This is an official statement by DoctorX & his Chemical Brothers and Sisters.

Our International Drug Checking Service was launched in 2014 to expand Energy Control’s core Harm Reduction strategy worldwide. Cryptomarket users have been one of our main goals and in this period Energy Control International has gained enough reputation to be considered a trustworthy source of information.

The acceptance of Drug Checking Services (DCS) iS increasing worldwide. However, DCS have to adhere to some strict criteria. One of them is that “final drug users“ is the specific target to whom this intervention is directed. Any single, specific test result is only representative for the sample the user provides us.

Things are more complicated in cryptomarkets. We insist in the idea that “a test result is only representative of a sample and can’t be used as guarantee of a vendor or product”.

But we inevitably receive samples from vendors. And some vendors make these results public, announcing their products as “EC tested”, and providing the (alleged) test result and the lab code.

We want to clarify that this is not a general complaint against all vendors who test their products with our IDCS. We believe that the potential of vendors and cryptomarkets administrators as relevant harm reduction agents should be considered and evaluated.

But we have found the following problems related with codes provided by vendors in cryptomarket products:

1) Information provided by some vendors is incoherent with our techniques.
2) Transcription problems
3) Selective publishing of results
4) “EC tested” and “high purity” do not mean “safe”
5) Inadequate use of our brand and logo.
6) Paleolithic codes

You can find detailed examples in our website

https://energycontrol-international.org/use-and-abuse-of-drug-checking-by-cryptomarkets-vendors/


We insist in the idea that this report is not a complaint against vendors that use our Drug Checking Service. But we want to clarify that providing a code or advertising a product as “tested by Energy Control” can´t be used as a guarantee for any market, vendor o product. We think that (at least some) vendors have a great potential as harm reduction agents.

We are studying strategies to promote this role without breaking current legal framework and how to avoid inadequate use of our test results. We are open to cryptomarkets community ideas, suggestions, opinions and criticisms.
/u/scruples
3 points
6 years ago
I don't wish to inhibit vendors using your services for their own peace of mind, however anything less than a strict prohibition for vendors to use the EC brand in promoting their products is unsatisfactory. While it might be that some will be honest, those are not the problem; it's the ones who will game the system that are the problem.

1. Submit product X and receive desired results
2. Publish desired results then sell product Y

tl;dr EC is not designed to be a marketing tool and anything short of absolute disavowal of vendors using your brand is totally unacceptable.
/u/Pneuma
1 points
6 years ago
I don't think there is any real way to enforce this. The best thing you could do is spread the meme that it's not decorum for a Vendor to advertize that their product is EC tested. If most folks know that this is frowned upon then it would deincentivize vendors from abusing the service.
/u/earpain
1 points
5 years ago
I don't see any real drastic benefit to prohibting vendors from claiming EC test results, or just making it a 'faux pas'. Big deal, so vendor will make a schill account, even order from themselves on a market if need be, and post the cherry picked, misconstrued, or totally fake tests results pretending to be a regular user.
I see only two real solutions, but it's clear that both are slowly but surely becoming realities:
1. Multiple EC test results for vendors, done by users. Just like the more reviews there are, the more likely that they will statistically lean towards honest reviews, the more EC test reports, the clearer will become the big picture of the situation.
2. I myself and several others are regularly conversing and brainstorming possible 'kitchen chemistry' tests, methods of purification, and warnings of known adulterants and observed complications with identifying them. Every drug category has it's own peculiarities. I think it's fair to say that bluelight on the clearnet is the birthplace of most such innovations. EC I love you all so much, and thank you so so much for the research you publish regularly and the service you do. In honor of a few beloved ones that have died because they didnt know what drugs they were doing, thankyou SO much.