News Feed
  • DrugHub has agreed to fully refund all users who lost money in the SuperMarket exit scam.  
  • Retro Market has gone offline. Circumstances of the closure unknown.  
  • SuperMarket has closed following an exit scam by one of the admins.  
  • The admin of Incognito Market, Pharoah, has been arrested by the FBI several months after exit scamming.  
  • Silk RoadTorhoo mini logo
  • darknet markets list
  • Popular P2P exchange LocalMonero has announced it is closing.  

WARNING: Haveno's multi-sig setup does not protect liquidity (open offers) : Monero | Torhoo darknet markets

How can anyone honestly think that locked haveno coins are truly in self-custody? In reality, bad haveno arbiters could easily pretend to be legit takers and get the 2/3 majority needed to approve a transaction, which could lead to theft. Even worse, admin bots could just wipe out the whole haveno order book with ease. Those issues have been confirmed by official dread mods and some reddit users.

Quote SaberhagenTheNameless:
...afaict Haveno/Retoswap, in it's current state, has more at risk from rugpulls than necessary - currently over a million USD at stake.
Sell offers are sitting there waiting to be automatically locked into a 2/3 multisig once taken (from potentially malicious admins controlling arbitrator/taker bots meaning they would have enough keys to steal)
Right now nothing is really preventing admins from sweeping the entire orderbook on the sell side.
Source: https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsy7hmx9n2ws94x92ftvc44ylkejyg8ygw9z9pt4eswj44yqewp3jcpzamhxue69uhkvet9v3ejumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshs0gztdf
Cached: https://archive.ph/JOqDC#25%

Quote shortwavesurfer2009:
The way it would work would be that an arbitrator would create a bot to take the offers and then use the key from the taker bot and their arbitrator key to steal the escrow which contains the seller's Monero plus their security deposit.
Source: https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs0h2fvwvcsg58l6xw9hwpav4kk3vry933rrm6pparrf0s7p9rel6gpz4mhxue69uhkg6t5w3hjuur4vghhyetvv9uszyrhwden5te0v5hxummn9ekx7mp0qythwumn8ghj7en9v4j8xtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0mvpr6f
Cached: https://archive.ph/gSRVs#25%

Quote https://torhoo.cc/go.php?u=TDNVdlYyOXZaR1Z1U1c1bWIzSnRZWFJwYjI0M016QT0=#:
The arbitrators could rug the whole orderbook (all sell offers and security deposits) by taking all the offers at once.
Source: https://rl.bloat.cat/r/Monero/comments/1l5jkp2/openmonerocom_got_hacked_as_reported_in_their/mwp7yhn/?context=3#mwp7yhn
Cached: https://archive.ph/icuxp#65%

Quote: https://torhoo.cc/go.php?u=TDNVdmJXOXVaWEp2WDJSbGMydGZjM1Z3Y0c5eWRBPT0=#:
After some thoughts, I think you are right and that the arbitration system in Haveno doesn't prevent arbitrators from pulling the funds. They would need to create a bot that takes all the offers and automatically unlock the funds with the key of the taker and arbitrator
Source: http://dreadytofatroptsdj6io7l3xptbet6onoyno2yv7jicoxknyazubrad.onion/post/4e7e530582ff902b6903/#c-cac5570453f7fa9f42

Quote https://torhoo.cc/go.php?u=TDNVdloyVnZibWxqWHc9PQ==# (Monero Outreach Producer):
Reto has been around for a few milliseconds basically and nothing stops the network operators from creating fake orders if the pot gets big enough. A network would have to be operating successfully for a few years before I trust it with any significant amounts.
Source: https://rl.bloat.cat/r/Monero/comments/1h4icot/is_haveno_anymore_secure_than_trading_with_a/m0ae3rk/?context=3#m0ae3rk
Cached: https://archive.ph/bB1VN#84%

Quote https://torhoo.cc/go.php?u=TDNVdlYyOXZaR1Z1U1c1bWIzSnRZWFJwYjI0M016QT0=#: To post an offer, you have to deposit the amount + security deposit. If an arbitrator acts maliciously, they could take an offer and essentially steal the funds by signing the 2/3 multisig transaction, since they'd have two keys.
Source: https://rl.bloat.cat/r/Monero/comments/1l5jkp2/openmonerocom_got_hacked_as_reported_in_their/mwj10k3/?context=3#mwj10k3
Cached: https://archive.ph/icuxp#45%

Quote https://torhoo.cc/go.php?u=TDNVdmFtOXpjMloxYmc9PQ==#:
Haveno relies upon arbitration by the network you’re operating on. In a case where the arbitrators act maliciously they can create trades where they control 2/3 keys to seize funds.
Source: https://rl.bloat.cat/r/Monero/comments/1h4icot/is_haveno_anymore_secure_than_trading_with_a/
Cached: https://archive.ph/bB1VN
And yet the steal happened on openmonero instead of haveno.
/u/OpenMonero 📢
1 points
2 weeks ago
Just to clear things up, I've never said that funds can't be stolen. My main goal was to reduce potential losses if there's ever a security breach, since you can't completely prevent hacks.

Some folks on Twitter and Reddit are accusing me of an exit scam, but that doesn't make any sense. Shutting down a profitable platform and running off with just $20-25k wouldn’t be worth it.

If I had set things up like Haveno, the amount I could've potentially run off with would’ve been at least $2 million (according to haveno.markets) that's a thousand times more. This is because offers on openmonero are not pre-funded. Check out the liquidity on openmonero.markets. It’s usually between 10 and 50 XMR

I think I was right about my approach, and the recent hack actually proves it. The platform is built to handle large volumes, while keeping the amount of funds that could be stolen really low. That's what makes the OM platform one of the most decentralized liquidity solutions out there.
/u/Availik 🍼
0 points
3 weeks ago
Starting the FUD campaign again? Perhaps don't throw stones in glass houses.

Could you answer these two questions:
How much money was stolen through haveno through your proposed method?
How much was stolen through openmonero?
/u/OpenMonero 📢
1 points
3 weeks ago*
I agree, haveno is a glass house. We need to be careful and build something more stable.

Haveno’s multi-sig trading only protects trades that have already been accepted, which is only 1% of all the liquidity. The rest, like open offers, aren’t protected and could potentially be taken or misused by the admins. So, it’s confusing why some people still see Haveno as a fully self-custodial exchange, when in reality, it’s more like a centralized liquidity platform. We shall not advertise centralized liquidity platforms in this forum. Liquidity should be decentralized to prevent exit scams.

How to fix haveno?
Addressing the rug pull concern can be straightforwardly achieved by disabling pre-funded offers and permitting each maker to fund the trade only after a trade request has been initiated. (this is how openmonero works). Unfortunately, the developers have shown little interest in implementing such a solution, as it would substantially decentralize liquidity.

To date, only about 20k USD of user funds have been stolen, (plus 3k arbiter funds), despite a monthly trade volume of roughly half a million dollars. Had I implemented a setup like haveno, I’d probably have seen at least 2.5 million USD stolen (according to haveno.markets)

For a more detailed understanding, please read the section about self-custodial trade funding:
https://openmonero.com/faq#self-custodial-trading-funding
/u/[deleted] 🍼
0 points
2 weeks ago
Refund your users. Claiming monero multisig is insecure and getting hacked month laters, what a clown hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Retar Dio